Mendelsohn v. Rosenberg

248 A.D. 743
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJune 15, 1936
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 248 A.D. 743 (Mendelsohn v. Rosenberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mendelsohn v. Rosenberg, 248 A.D. 743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Opinion

Defendant, Joseph Rosenberg, appeals from an order finding him in contempt of court, fining him the sum of $3,050, with interest, making a total of $3,807, and directing that he may purge himself of contempt by paying to the receiver in the action the said amount within ten days, to be applied in favor of plaintiff and six other defendants named in the order. The judgment herein states that the sum of $8,917.28 was received by appellant from a life insurance company as proceeds of two life insurance policies on the life of Samuel Richardson, deceased, in trust for the use and benefit of plaintiff and all the defendants except appellant. The appellant was directed by said judgment to pay to the receiver in the action the sum of $3,050 (the amount of the claims of plaintiff and said defendants to said fund), with interest, together with costs. Appellant failed to make the payments. He has been punished for contempt for such failure. While the receiver in the action may not be an officer of the court as provided in section 505 of the Civil Practice Act, yet, since it appears that the moneys appellant bad in hand were a trust fund “ ear-marked as a specific or particular fund directed or required to be paid over ” (Nelson v. Hirsch, 264 N. Y. 316), the court had discretionary power, at least, to punish for cqntempt. The facts fully justified the exercise of the discretion. Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Johnston, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Ferrell
172 A.2d 555 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1961)
Cegala v. Cegala
273 A.D. 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)
Keesing v. Solomon
142 F.2d 1005 (Second Circuit, 1944)
Keesing v. Wishnefsky
52 F. Supp. 625 (S.D. New York, 1943)
Fingerhut v. Hirsch
182 Misc. 429 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)
In re the Estate of Kramsky
172 Misc. 935 (New York Surrogate's Court, 1939)
Polo v. Stern
249 A.D. 638 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Polo v. Stern
161 Misc. 264 (New York Supreme Court, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
248 A.D. 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendelsohn-v-rosenberg-nyappdiv-1936.