Mendell v. French

New York Court of Common Pleas

Mendell v. French

2 Hilt. 178

DecidedDecember 15, 1858

StatusPublished

This text of 2 Hilt. 178 (Mendell v. French) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mendell v. French, 2 Hilt. 178 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1858).

Pincite

Opinion

Brady, J.

A perusal of the testimony in this case shows it to be conflicting. In such cases the finding cannot be disturbed, [179]*179unless the evidence against it so greatly preponderates as to warrant the inference of bias, corruption, or partiality, even although the court may be of opinion, as the evidence appears on paper, that they should have found differently. Mazetti v. The N.Y. & Harlem RR. Co., 3 E. D. Smith, 98.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brady, J.

A perusal of the testimony in this case shows it to be conflicting. In such cases the finding cannot be disturbed, [179]*179unless the evidence against it so greatly preponderates as to warrant the inference of bias, corruption, or partiality, even although the court may be of opinion, as the evidence appears on paper, that they should have found differently. Mazetti v. The N.Y. & Harlem RR. Co., 3 E. D. Smith, 98.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 Hilt. 178, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendell-v-french-nyctcompl-1858.