Mendel v. Mendel
230 A.D. 869
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Order denying defendant’s motion to set aside and vacate the notice of examination of the defendant before trial reversed upon the law and the facts, xvithout costs, and motion granted, xvithout costs. (Safrin v. Safrin, 205 App. Div. 628; Horsch v. Horsch, 206 id. 710; Hutaff v. Hutaff, 208 id. 745.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mendel v. Mendel, 230 A.D. 869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).
230 A.D. 869 (Mendel v. Mendel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tavalin v. Tavalin
13 Misc. 2d 909 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Miller v. Miller
188 Misc. 644 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)
Levi v. Levi
182 Misc. 445 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)