Mendel v. Mendel
This text of 230 A.D. 869 (Mendel v. Mendel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying defendant’s motion to set aside and vacate the notice of examination of the defendant before trial reversed upon the law and the facts, xvithout costs, and motion granted, xvithout costs. (Safrin v. Safrin, 205 App. Div. 628; Horsch v. Horsch, 206 id. 710; Hutaff v. Hutaff, 208 id. 745.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendel-v-mendel-nyappdiv-1930.