Mendel v. Mendel

230 A.D. 869
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 15, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 230 A.D. 869 (Mendel v. Mendel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mendel v. Mendel, 230 A.D. 869 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

Opinion

Order denying defendant’s motion to set aside and vacate the notice of examination of the defendant before trial reversed upon the law and the facts, xvithout costs, and motion granted, xvithout costs. (Safrin v. Safrin, 205 App. Div. 628; Horsch v. Horsch, 206 id. 710; Hutaff v. Hutaff, 208 id. 745.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tavalin v. Tavalin
13 Misc. 2d 909 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)
Miller v. Miller
188 Misc. 644 (New York Supreme Court, 1947)
Levi v. Levi
182 Misc. 445 (New York Supreme Court, 1943)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 A.D. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mendel-v-mendel-nyappdiv-1930.