Mendel v. Berwyn Estates

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Mendel v. Berwyn Estates

149 A. 893, 106 N.J. Eq. 275

Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 5, 1930·Published

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 104 N. J. Eq. 416, sub nom. Eckhouse v. Berwyn Estates.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

The decree appealed from will he affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Berry, and reported in 104 N. J. Eq. 416, sub nom. Eckhouse v. Berwyn Estates.

For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Trenchard, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 14.

For reversal — None.

Mendel v. Berwyn Estates, 149 A. 893, 106 N.J. Eq. 275 (N.J. 1930).

Pincite

149 A. 893 (Mendel v. Berwyn Estates) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.