Mencher v. Richards

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mencher v. Richards

258 A.D. 977, 17 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8515

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mencher v. Richards. Read the opinion of the Court — 256 A.D. 280 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 22, 1940·Published

Opinion

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See ante, p. 925.] The following question is certified: Was an examination before trial of the defendant Empire Title & Guarantee Company, a moneyed corporation, as to items 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22, and of the individual defendants Richards, Paulson and Ohlau, directors of a moneyed corporation, as to items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, set forth in plaintiff’s notices of motion, properly denied as a matter of law? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See ante, p. 925.] The following question is certified: Was an examination before trial of the defendant Empire Title & Guarantee Company, a moneyed corporation, as to items 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22, and of the individual defendants Richards, Paulson and Ohlau, directors of a moneyed corporation, as to items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, set forth in plaintiff’s notices of motion, properly denied as a matter of law? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.

Mencher v. Richards, 258 A.D. 977, 17 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8515 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1940).

Pincite

258 A.D. 977 (Mencher v. Richards) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.