Mencher v. Richards
This text of 258 A.D. 977 (Mencher v. Richards) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See ante, p. 925.] The following question is certified: Was an examination before trial of the defendant Empire Title & Guarantee Company, a moneyed corporation, as to items 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22, and of the individual defendants Richards, Paulson and Ohlau, directors of a moneyed corporation, as to items 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, set forth in plaintiff’s notices of motion, properly denied as a matter of law? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
258 A.D. 977, 17 N.Y.S.2d 1013, 1940 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8515, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mencher-v-richards-nyappdiv-1940.