Menasha Wooden Ware Co. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway
245 U.S. 633, 62 L. Ed. 522, 38 S. Ct. 133, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1713
Opinion
Judgment affirmed with -.costs upon the authority of Armour Packing Co. v. United States, 209 U. S. 56, 80 et seq.; Louis. & Nash. R. R. Co. v. Mottley, 219 U. S. 467; Portland Railway &c. Co. v. Railroad Commission of Oregon, 229 U. S. 397, 412, 413; New York Central & Hudson River R. r. Co. v. Gray, 239 U. S. 583.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Menasha Wooden Ware Co. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway, 245 U.S. 633, 62 L. Ed. 522, 38 S. Ct. 133, 1917 U.S. LEXIS 1713 (1917).
245 U.S. 633 (Menasha Wooden Ware Co. v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Armour Packing Co. v. United States
209 U.S. 56 (Supreme Court, 1908)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Mottley
219 U.S. 467 (Supreme Court, 1911)
Portland Railway, Light & Power Co. v. Railroad Commission
229 U.S. 397 (Supreme Court, 1913)
New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. Gray
239 U.S. 583 (Supreme Court, 1916)