Menasco v. Hawkins
4 F.2d 1020, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3198
This text of 4 F.2d 1020 (Menasco v. Hawkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Menasco v. Hawkins, 4 F.2d 1020, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3198 (5th Cir. 1925).
Opinion
This was an action by the plaintiff in error for alleged malicious prosecution. Nothing is presented for review, except rulings of the court on objections to evidence. We think that each of those rulings obviously is either so free from error or nonprejudicial that no more need be said than that none of them involved reversible error. The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
4 F.2d 1020, 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 3198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/menasco-v-hawkins-ca5-1925.