Mena v. Goord

243 A.D.2d 566, 665 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9817

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Department of Correctional Services, dated July 2, 1996, which affirmed a determination of a Hearing Officer dated April 23, 1996, after a Tier III Superintendent’s hearing finding the petitioner guilty of certain misconduct and imposing penalties.

Adjudged that the determination is confirmed and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, without costs or disbursements.

The testimony of the charging officer, as well as the written misbehavior report, constituted substantial evidence of the petitioner’s misconduct (Matter of Perez v Wilmot, 67 NY2d 615; Matter of Duso v Kralik, 216 AD2d 297).

The petitioner’s remaining contentions are without merit. Ritter, J. P., Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mena v. Goord, 243 A.D.2d 566, 665 N.Y.S.2d 292, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

243 A.D.2d 566 (Mena v. Goord) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perez v. Wilmot
490 N.E.2d 526 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Duso v. Kralik
216 A.D.2d 297 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)