Mena v. City of Simi Valley
354 F.3d 1015, 2004 WL 57714
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 14, 2004·No. No. 01-56673·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinions
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
ORDER
The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc.
The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.
The petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc are denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mena v. City of Simi Valley, 354 F.3d 1015, 2004 WL 57714 (9th Cir. 2004).
354 F.3d 1015 (Mena v. City of Simi Valley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Iris Mena v. City Of Simi Valley
354 F.3d 1015 (Ninth Circuit, 2004)