Mena v. City of Simi Valley

Ninth Circuit

Mena v. City of Simi Valley

354 F.3d 1015, 2004 WL 57714

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

DecidedJanuary 14, 2004

DocketNo. 01-56673

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 354 F.3d 1015 (Mena v. City of Simi Valley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mena v. City of Simi Valley, 354 F.3d 1015, 2004 WL 57714 (9th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinions

ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING AND SUGGESTION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

ORDER

The panel has voted to deny the petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc.

The full court was advised of the suggestion for rehearing en banc. A judge requested a vote on whether to rehear the matter en banc. The matter failed to receive a majority of the votes of the non-recused active judges in favor of en banc consideration. Fed. R.App. P. 35.

The petition for rehearing and the suggestion for rehearing en banc are denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI