Mena v. City of New York
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK GERALDO MENA,
Plaintiff,
against CIVIL ACTION NO.: 15 Civ. 3707 (ALC) (SLC)
ORDER THE CITY OF NEW YORK, et al.,
Defendants.
SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
A Telephone Conference was held today, March 4, 2020, concerning Plaintiff Geraldo Mena’s letter-motion to reopen discovery (ECF No. 88). The Court has considered each of the six factors applicable to a request to reopen discovery, see City of Almaty, Kazakhstan v. Ablyazov, 2019 WL 275701, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Jan. 22, 2019); Jones v. Hirschfeld, 2003 WL 21415323, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. June 19, 2003), and finds that Mena has demonstrated that good cause exists to reopen discovery. Therefore, Mena’s Letter-Motion to reopen discovery for the limited purpose of taking a limited number of depositions is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. Discovery in this action will be reopened for an additional 30 days for the limited purpose of allowing Mena to (1) depose Correctional Officers Kevin Marin, Kevin Radie, Patrick Francis, and Hope, and (2) conduct a deposition of no longer than one (1) hour of Defendants’ Rule 30(b)(6) designee knowledgeable about the policies and procedures of the Department of Correction’s video recording and retention procedures during the relevant period. Mena’s request to depose Correctional Officers Clifford Clement and Joshua Carson is DENIED. The parties are directed to file a joint letter by Monday, April 6, 2020 confirming the completion of the depositions and stating the parties’ anticipated steps to move the case forward. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed to close ECF No. 88.
Dated: New York, New York March 4, 2020 SO ORDERED
AMIGA OL GARAH L. CAVE nited States Magistrate Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mena v. City of New York (Mena v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.