Mena Latorre v. Registrar of Property

80 P.R. 755
CourtSupreme Court of Puerto Rico
DecidedOctober 23, 1958
DocketNo. 1340
StatusPublished

This text of 80 P.R. 755 (Mena Latorre v. Registrar of Property) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Puerto Rico primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mena Latorre v. Registrar of Property, 80 P.R. 755 (prsupreme 1958).

Opinion

Per curiam.

Appellant only alleges that he was the authenticating notary of the public instrument involved in this case. We have already decided that, pursuant to § 6 of the Mortgage Law (30 L.P.R.A. §31), the notaries authenticating public instruments are not interested parties who may request the record thereof and have no standing to file an administrative appeal against the decisions of the registrar related to instru[756]*756ments executed before them. Más v. The Registrar of Property, 16 P.R.R. 9 (1910) and Roig v. The Registrar of Property, 18 P.R.R. 11 (1912).

In the absence of any allegation of facts which may justify the conclusion that appellant is an interested party, whether in his own right or as petitioner on behalf of an interested party, the present administrative appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Said allegation is essential and must be made within the term of twenty days in order to take an appeal. See § § 2 and 3 of the Act of March 1, 1902, 30 L.P.R.A. § § 1772 and 1773. Cf. Hernández v. Registrar of San Juan, 29 P.R.R. 59 (1921.)

The administrative appeal will be dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
80 P.R. 755, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mena-latorre-v-registrar-of-property-prsupreme-1958.