Memphis v. Brown

94 U.S. 715, 24 L. Ed. 244, 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1932
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedApril 23, 1877
StatusPublished
Cited by51 cases

This text of 94 U.S. 715 (Memphis v. Brown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Memphis v. Brown, 94 U.S. 715, 24 L. Ed. 244, 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1932 (1877).

Opinion

Me. Chief Justice Waite

delivered the- opinion of the court. '

We think that the order made by the Circuit Court, May 20, 1876, upon the motion to subject merchants’ capital to the tax was such a final judgment as may be brought here for reexamination by a writ of error. The precise question decided by that order had never before been presented in the cause. The city was then for the first time required, in express terms', to subject this particular class of property to the adjudged taxation. The writ was, therefore, properly sued out upon the judgment.

Under the ruling in Brockett v. Brockett, 2 How. 241, the motion made during the term to set aside the judgment of *718 March 2 suspended the operation of that judgment, so that it did not take final effect for the purposes of a writ of error until May 20, when the motion was disposed of. In addition to this, the form of the entry of May 20 is equivalent to setting aside the judgment of March 2, and entering it anew as of that date. This the court had the right to do during the term, and for the very purpose of giving it effect for a supersedeas. Sage et al. v. Central Railroad Company of Iowa et al., 98 U. S. 412. As the writ was issued on the day of the order, and its allowance embraced in the entry recording the order itself, there cannot be' any doubt of the intention of the court to give the judgment at that time such an effect. Motions denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Progressive Industries, Inc. v. United States
131 Fed. Cl. 66 (Federal Claims, 2017)
Witt v. Merrill Et Ux
208 F.2d 285 (Fourth Circuit, 1953)
Trowell v. Diamond Supply Co.
91 A.2d 797 (Supreme Court of Delaware, 1952)
Trowell v. Diamond Supply Co.
91 A.2d 797 (Superior Court of Delaware, 1952)
Atlantic Greyhound Corp. v. Public Service Commission
54 S.E.2d 169 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1949)
Fleming v. Borders
165 F.2d 101 (Ninth Circuit, 1947)
City of MacOn v. Herrington
32 S.E.2d 517 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1944)
Denholm & McKay Co. v. Commissioner of Int. Rev.
132 F.2d 243 (First Circuit, 1942)
Mahan v. Sparks
10 Alaska 292 (D. Alaska, 1942)
Suggs v. Mutual Ben. Health & Accident Ass'n
115 F.2d 80 (Tenth Circuit, 1940)
Pérez v. District Court of San Juan
54 P.R. 780 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1939)
Amador Pérez v. Corte de Distrito de San Juan
54 P.R. Dec. 821 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1939)
United States v. Steinberg
100 F.2d 124 (Second Circuit, 1938)
Mutual Health & Benefit Ass'n v. Cranford
156 So. 876 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1934)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. People's Banking Co.
170 A. 554 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1934)
Burnet v. Lexington Ice & Coal Co.
62 F.2d 906 (Fourth Circuit, 1933)
The Astorian
57 F.2d 85 (Ninth Circuit, 1932)
Di Meglio v. Giagoni
57 F.2d 85 (Ninth Circuit, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
94 U.S. 715, 24 L. Ed. 244, 1876 U.S. LEXIS 1932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/memphis-v-brown-scotus-1877.