Home/Supreme Court/Mempa v. Rhay

Mempa v. Rhay

386 U.S. 953, 87 S. Ct. 1017
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mempa v. Rhay. Read the opinion of the Court — 389 U.S. 128 →
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 13, 1967·No. No. 424; No. 734·Published

Opinion

Sup. Ct. Wash. (Certiorari granted, ante, p. 907.) Motions of petitioners for leave, to proceed further herein in forma- pauperis granted. Motions of petitioners for appointment of counsel are also granted. It is ordered that Evan L. Schwab, Esquire, of Seattle, Washington, be, and he is hereby, appointed to serve as counsel for petitioners in these cases.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mempa v. Rhay, 386 U.S. 953, 87 S. Ct. 1017 (1967).

386 U.S. 953 (Mempa v. Rhay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.