Memorylink Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Memorylink Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 676 F.3d 1051
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided December 8, 2011·No. 2010-1533·Unpublished

Opinion

NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

MEMORYLINK CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

MOTOROLA, INC., JONATHAN P. MEYER, HUGH C. DUNLOP, THOMAS G. BERRY, J. RAY WOOD, and TERRI S. HUGHES, Defendants-Appellees. ____________________

2010-1533 ______________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois in No. 09-CV-7401, Judge William J. Hibbler.

______________________

JUDGMENT ______________________

PAUL E. SCHAAFSMA, Novus IP, LLC, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

ANNE M. SIDRYS, P.C., Kirkland & Ellis, LLP, of Chicago, Illinois, argued for defendants-appellees. With her on the brief were NYIKA O. STRICKLAND and JOEL R. MERKIN. Of counsel was JESS M. KRANNICH. ______________________ THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is

ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

PER CURIAM (LOURIE, BRYSON, and MOORE, Circuit Judges).

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.

ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT

December 8, 2011 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorylink Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Memorylink Corp. v. Motorola, Inc. (Memorylink Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.