Memorial Hospital v. Rockingham County

189 S.E. 494, 211 N.C. 205, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 42
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 27, 1937·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

We deem it inadvisable to make final disposition of the question sought to be presented, because the record is barren of any factual determination. It was agreed that this should be done by the court, but in drawing the judgment, which was evidently prepared by counsel, the factual basis of the judgment was omitted. A finding of the facts is desirable in order that we may determine the question of law or legal inference which the parties wish decided. Refining Co. v. McKernan, 178 N. C., 82, 100 S. E., 121; Trust Co. v. Transit Lines, 198 N. C., 675, 153 S. E., 158; S. c., 200 N. C., 415, 157 S. E., 62, and cases there cited. To this end, the judgment will be vacated and the cause remanded to the Superior Court of Rockingham County for further proceedings as to justice appertains and the rights of the parties may require.

Error and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Memorial Hospital v. Rockingham County, 189 S.E. 494, 211 N.C. 205, 1937 N.C. LEXIS 42 (N.C. 1937).

189 S.E. 494 (Memorial Hospital v. Rockingham County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Town of Warrenton v. Warren County
215 N.C. 342 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1939)