Membreno v. Hack Realty, LLC

92 A.D.3d 649, 937 N.Y.2d 880

Opinion

Under the circumstances of this case, the Supreme Court properly denied the third-party defendant’s motion pursuant to CPLR 3211 (a) (5) to dismiss the third-party complaint based on the doctrine of res judicata (see generally Matter of People v Applied Card Sys., Inc., 11 NY3d 105, 122 [2008], cert denied sub nom. Cross Country Bank, Inc. v New York, 555 US 1136 [2009]; Landau, P.C. v LaRossa, Mitchell & Ross, 11 NY3d 8, 13 [2008]; Buechel v Bain, 97 NY2d 295, 304-305 [2001], cert denied 535 US 1096 [2002]; Johansen v Gillen Living Trust, 63 AD3d 1006 [2009]). Dillon, J.P., Leventhal, Belen and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Membreno v. Hack Realty, LLC, 92 A.D.3d 649, 937 N.Y.2d 880 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

92 A.D.3d 649 (Membreno v. Hack Realty, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Buechel v. Bain
766 N.E.2d 914 (New York Court of Appeals, 2001)
Landau, P.C. v. LaRossa, Mitchell & Ross
892 N.E.2d 380 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
People v. Applied Card Systems, Inc.
894 N.E.2d 1 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
Johansen v. Gillen Living Trust
63 A.D.3d 1006 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)