Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Melweb Signs, Inc. v. Beefy King, Inc.

Melweb Signs, Inc. v. Beefy King, Inc.

226 So. 2d 828, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5357
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 17, 1969
DocketNo. 2444
StatusPublished

This text of 226 So. 2d 828 (Melweb Signs, Inc. v. Beefy King, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Melweb Signs, Inc. v. Beefy King, Inc., 226 So. 2d 828, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5357 (Fla. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have examined the record in light of the appellate presentment and find no harmful or reversible error. We specifically reject appellant’s argument that the trial court erred in refusing to ■ admit the deposition of Tatsuo Rushing, appellees’ witness, for impeachment purposes for the reason that appellant did not properly lay a predicate in accordance with Hancock v. [829]*829McDonald, Fla.App.1963, 148 So.2d 56. Also see 35 Fla.Jur., Witnesses, §§ 240-248.

Affirmed.

CROSS, C. J., and WALDEN and REED, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hancock v. McDonald
148 So. 2d 56 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1963)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
226 So. 2d 828, 1969 Fla. App. LEXIS 5357, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melweb-signs-inc-v-beefy-king-inc-fladistctapp-1969.