Melvino Technologies, Ltd. v. Kappos
This text of Melvino Technologies, Ltd. v. Kappos (Melvino Technologies, Ltd. v. Kappos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
2011-1161 ______________________
MELVINO TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED, Appellant, v. DAVID J. KAPPOS, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, Appellee, and TRANSWORKS, INC., Appellee. ______________________
Appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Inferences in Reexamination No. 95/000,368. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
SCOTT A. HORSTEMEYER, Thomas, Kayden, Horstemeyer and Risley, LLP, of Atlanta, Georgia, for appellant.
RAYMOND T. CHEN, Solicitor, United States Patent and Trademark Office, of Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee. With him on the brief were BRIAN T. RACILLA, and JANET A. GONGOLA, Associate Solicitors. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is
ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (LINN, DYK, and O’MALLEY, Circuit Judges).
AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
February 9, 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date Jan Horbaly Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Melvino Technologies, Ltd. v. Kappos, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melvino-technologies-ltd-v-kappos-cafc-2012.