Melvin v. Outlaw

107 S.W.2d 419, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 666
Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 25, 1937·No. No. 1688.·Published

Opinion

GRISSOM, .Justice.

Appellant sued appellees, the independent executor and beneficiaries under the will of A.' H. Scott, deceased, for debt and foreclosure of an alleged lien.

At the conclusion of the evidence the court instructed the jury to, and it did, return a verdict for the defendants. From a judgment in accordance with the verdict plaintiff has appealed to this court.

The case is before this court upon transcript and statement of facts, no briefs having been filed.

We have inspected the record and have discovered no fundamental error. The judgment of the district court is affirmed. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Groc. Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.(2d) 811; Gregory v. Jacob (Tex.Civ.App.) 94 S.W.(2d) 513; Federal Underwriters Exchange v. Husted (Tex.Civ.App.) 94 S.W.(2d) 540.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Melvin v. Outlaw, 107 S.W.2d 419, 1937 Tex. App. LEXIS 666 (Tex. Ct. App. 1937).

107 S.W.2d 419 (Melvin v. Outlaw) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Haynes v. J. F. Radford Grocery Company
14 S.W.2d 811 (Texas Supreme Court, 1929)
Federal Underwriters Exchange v. Husted
94 S.W.2d 540 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)
Gregory v. Jacob
94 S.W.2d 513 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1936)