Melvin v. Naylor

Fourth Circuit

Melvin v. Naylor

669 F. App'x 115

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 3, 2016·No. No. 16-1205·Published

Opinion

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pamela Melvin appeals the district court’s various pretrial orders, final order dismissing her civil complaint, and a subsequent order denying her motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Melvin v. Naylor, No. 5:14-cv-00486-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2015; Feb. 25, 2016). We grant Melvin’s motion to exceed the length limitations for her informal reply brief. We dispense with-oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Pamela Melvin appeals the district court’s various pretrial orders, final order dismissing her civil complaint, and a subsequent order denying her motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Melvin v. Naylor, No. 5:14-cv-00486-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2015; Feb. 25, 2016). We grant Melvin’s motion to exceed the length limitations for her informal reply brief. We dispense with-oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Melvin v. Naylor, 669 F. App'x 115 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

669 F. App'x 115 (Melvin v. Naylor) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.