Melvin v. Naylor
This text of 669 F. App'x 115 (Melvin v. Naylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Pamela Melvin appeals the district court’s various pretrial orders, final order dismissing her civil complaint, and a subsequent order denying her motion to alter or amend judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Melvin v. Naylor, No. 5:14-cv-00486-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 13, 2015; Feb. 25, 2016). We grant Melvin’s motion to exceed the length limitations for her informal reply brief. We dispense with-oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
669 F. App'x 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melvin-v-naylor-ca4-2016.