Melvin v. City of New York

244 A.D.2d 390, 665 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11283
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 10, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs’ attorneys, Gardiner & Nolan, appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Greenstein, J.), dated December 23, 1996, which, after a hearing, awarded the plaintiffs’ former counsel, David M. Lee, attorney’s fees in the principal sum of $13,385.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

We find no basis to conclude that the Supreme Court improvidently exercised its discretion in apportioning counsel fees in this case (see, Matter of Budin, Reisman & Schwartz v [391] Giamboi, Reiss & Squitieri, 224 AD2d 325; see generally, Matter of Cohen v Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell, 81 NY2d 655; Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 NY2d 454). Miller, J. P., Ritter, Sullivan, Santucci and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Melvin v. City of New York, 244 A.D.2d 390, 665 N.Y.S.2d 544, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11283 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

244 A.D.2d 390 (Melvin v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Ben-Aroya v. Plotke
285 A.D.2d 482 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)
Simas v. Agency Rent-A-Car, Inc.
261 A.D.2d 603 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1999)