Melvin Raymond Schield, Jr. v. Dianna Lee Schield
This text of Melvin Raymond Schield, Jr. v. Dianna Lee Schield (Melvin Raymond Schield, Jr. v. Dianna Lee Schield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued April 10, 2014.
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-12-00849-CV ——————————— MELVIN RAYMOND SCHIELD, JR., Appellant V. DIANNA LEE SCHIELD, Appellee
On Appeal from the 300th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 62712
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Melvin Raymond Schield, Jr., perfected an appeal from the trial
court’s judgment signed on August 10, 2012. The trial court clerk filed the clerk’s
record on March 4, 2013. The court reporter filed the reporter’s record on June 14, 2013. Appellant’s brief, therefore, was due to be filed no later than July 15, 2013.
See TEX. R. APP. P. 4.1(a), 38.6(a). This Court granted appellant’s motion for
extension of time to file his brief, extending the due date to October 14, 2013. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 38.6(d).
On October 18, 2013, after appellant failed to timely file a brief, the Clerk of
this Court notified appellant that he had failed to timely file a brief and that failure
to file a brief by October 28, 2013 could lead to dismissal of this appeal. See TEX.
R. APP. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b). The Clerk of this Court notified appellant at his address
at the Pam Lychner State Jail, 2350 Atascosita Road, Humble, Texas 77396. This
notice was returned to the Court, and the Court was informed that appellant had
been released and that the notice could not be forwarded.
Accordingly, because appellant has not filed a brief or responded to the
Court’s notice, and has not provided us with any other address or means of
contacting him, we dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See TEX. R. APP. P.
38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f). We dismiss any pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Jennings, Higley, and Sharp.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Melvin Raymond Schield, Jr. v. Dianna Lee Schield, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melvin-raymond-schield-jr-v-dianna-lee-schield-texapp-2014.