Melvin Perkins v. Edmond Rich, Policeman, and Judge Thomas Herlihy
This text of 316 F.2d 236 (Melvin Perkins v. Edmond Rich, Policeman, and Judge Thomas Herlihy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
316 F.2d 236
Melvin PERKINS, Appellant,
v.
Edmond RICH, Policeman, and Judge Thomas Herlihy, Appellees.
No. 14049.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued February 18, 1963.
Decided April 29, 1963.
Rehearing Denied May 24, 1963.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware; Richard S. Rodney, Judge.
Melvin Perkins, appellant, pro se.
Aubrey B. Lank, Asst. City Solicitor, Wilmington, Del., for appellees.
Before McLAUGHLIN and GANEY, Circuit Judges, and COHEN, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the district court will be affirmed on the opinion of Judge Rodney 204 F.Supp. 98.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
316 F.2d 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melvin-perkins-v-edmond-rich-policeman-and-judge-t-ca3-1963.