Melvin Leroy White v. Warden, Buckingham Correctional Center

902 F.2d 1567, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 7066, 1990 WL 64763
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMay 2, 1990
Docket89-6836
StatusUnpublished

This text of 902 F.2d 1567 (Melvin Leroy White v. Warden, Buckingham Correctional Center) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Melvin Leroy White v. Warden, Buckingham Correctional Center, 902 F.2d 1567, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 7066, 1990 WL 64763 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

902 F.2d 1567
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Melvin Leroy WHITE, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
WARDEN, BUCKINGHAM CORRECTIONAL CENTER, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 89-6836.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 28, 1990.
Decided May 2, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, United States Magistrate. (C/A No. 89-133-R)

Melvin Leroy White, appellant pro se.

Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Va., for appellee.

E.D.Va.

DISMISSED.

Before PHILLIPS and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Melvin White seeks to appeal the magistrate's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254.* Our review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the magistrate. White v. Warden, CA-89-133-R (E.D.Va. Aug. 16, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

*

The parties consented to the jurisdiction of the magistrate pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
902 F.2d 1567, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 7066, 1990 WL 64763, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melvin-leroy-white-v-warden-buckingham-correctional-center-ca4-1990.