Melvin Dashawn Griggs v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedApril 29, 2010
Docket02-09-00235-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Melvin Dashawn Griggs v. State (Melvin Dashawn Griggs v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Melvin Dashawn Griggs v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

                                                COURT OF APPEALS

                                                 SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                                                                FORT WORTH

       NOS.         2-09-234-CR

2-09-235-CR

2-09-236-CR

MELVIN DASHAWN GRIGGS                                                             APPELLANT

                                                             V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS                                                                             STATE

                                                       ------------

          FROM CRIMINAL DISTRICT COURT NO. 3 OF TARRANT COUNTY

                                      MEMORANDUM OPINION[1]

On February 22, 2010, the trial court filed a corrected certification of appellant Melvin Dashawn Griggs=s right to appeal his convictions that form the basis of these appeals.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), (f).  The corrected certification states that these are plea bargain cases in which Griggs has no right of appeal and that Griggs has waived his right of appeal.


Based on the information contained in the corrected certification, on March 16, 2010, we issued an order expressing our concern about whether we have jurisdiction over the appeals.  We explained that the appeals were subject to dismissal unless any party desiring to continue them filed a response showing grounds to continue them.  See Tex. R. App. P. 44.3.  We have not received any such response.  Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for want of jurisdiction.  See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(a)(2), (d), 43.2(f); Chavez v. State, 183 S.W.3d 675, 680 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006); Jackson v. State, 168 S.W.3d 239, 243 (Tex. App.CFort Worth 2005, no pet.).

PER CURIAM

PANEL:  LIVINGSTON, C.J.; MCCOY and MEIER, JJ.

DO NOT PUBLISH

Tex. R. App. P. 47.2(b)

DELIVERED:  April 29, 2010



[1]See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Chavez v. State
183 S.W.3d 675 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Jackson v. State
168 S.W.3d 239 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2005)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Melvin Dashawn Griggs v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melvin-dashawn-griggs-v-state-texapp-2010.