Melvin Burkett v. State
This text of Melvin Burkett v. State (Melvin Burkett v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE FILED MARCH SESSION, 1997 November 4, 1997
Cecil W. Crowson MELVIN LEE BURKETT, ) Appellate Court Clerk ) Appellant, ) No. 01C01-9605-CC-00202 ) ) Humphreys County v. ) ) Honorable Allen W. Wallace, Judge ) STATE OF TENNESSEE, ) (Post-Conviction) ) Appellee. )
DISSENTING OPINION
I respectfully dissent because I believe that State v. Roger Dale Hill, Sr.,
No. 01C01-9508-CC-00267, Wayne County (Tenn. Crim. App. June 20, 1996), app.
granted (Tenn. Jan. 6, 1997), represents the law in Tennessee. The indictment in the
present case is similar to that in Hill in all material respects. I note that in Jackson v.
Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 319, 99 S. Ct. 2781, 2789 (1979), the United States Supreme
Court concluded that conviction and punishment of an individual upon legally
insufficient evidence constituted a violation of due process. I believe that, similarly,
conviction and punishment upon a void indictment would constitute a violation of due
process.
____________________________ Joseph M. Tipton, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Melvin Burkett v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melvin-burkett-v-state-tenncrimapp-1996.