Melvin Bernard Gooden v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 20, 2019·No. 05-18-00722-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered February 20, 2019

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00722-CR

MELVIN BERNARD GOODEN, Appellant

V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F17-70898-I

ORDER We REINSTATE this appeal.

We abated the appeal for the trial court to appoint new counsel. On February 20, 2019,

we received the trial court’s order appointing counsel. We DIRECT the Clerk to list John Tatum

as appointed counsel for appellant. Future correspondence shall be sent to John Tatum at The

Summit, 2150 S. Central Expressway, Suite 200, McKinney, TX 75070.

We DENY appellant’s February 19, 2019 pro se motion for an evidentiary hearing to

determine whether he received the effective assistance of counsel “during the period for filing a

motion for new trial.” See Miniel v. State, 831 S.W.2d 310, 313 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992)

(appellant not entitled to hybrid representation by both counsel and himself pro se). Counsel has thirty days in which to determine and, if necessary, file any supplemental or

amended briefing. After thirty days, the case will be at issue and will be set for submission in due

course.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Melvin Bernard Gooden v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Melvin Bernard Gooden v. State (Melvin Bernard Gooden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miniel v. State
831 S.W.2d 310 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1992)