Melvin Bernard Gooden v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 20, 2019·No. 05-18-00722-CR·Published

Opinion

Order entered February 20, 2019

In The

Court of Appeals

Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-18-00722-CR

MELVIN BERNARD GOODEN, Appellant V.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee

On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 2 Dallas County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. F17-70898-I

ORDER

We REINSTATE this appeal.

We abated the appeal for the trial court to appoint new counsel. On February 20, 2019, we received the trial court’s order appointing counsel. We DIRECT the Clerk to list John Tatum as appointed counsel for appellant. Future correspondence shall be sent to John Tatum at The Summit, 2150 S. Central Expressway, Suite 200, McKinney, TX 75070.

We DENY appellant’s February 19, 2019 pro se motion for an evidentiary hearing to determine whether he received the effective assistance of counsel “during the period for filing a motion for new trial.” See Miniel v. State, 831 S.W.2d 310, 313 n.1 (Tex. Crim. App. 1992) (appellant not entitled to hybrid representation by both counsel and himself pro se).

Counsel has thirty days in which to determine and, if necessary, file any supplemental or amended briefing. After thirty days, the case will be at issue and will be set for submission in due course.

/s/ CORY L. CARLYLE

JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Melvin Bernard Gooden v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2019).

Melvin Bernard Gooden v. State (Melvin Bernard Gooden v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miniel v. State
831 S.W.2d 310 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1992)