Melton v. State
This text of 308 S.E.2d 378 (Melton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant was tried before a jury and convicted of child molestation. He appeals from the conviction and sentence entered thereon.
Appellant contends that the state failed to prove venue. “Evidence of venue, though slight, is sufficient in the absence of conflicting evidence. [Cit.] Venue may be proved by circumstantial as well as direct evidence.” Loftin v. State, 230 Ga. 92, 93 (2) (195 SE2d 402) (1973). The evidence in the instant case, direct and circumstantial, was sufficient, in the absence of any conflicting evidence, to prove that the crime committed by appellant occurred in Fulton County. See generally Cole v. State, 162 Ga. App. 353 (291 SE2d 427) (1982).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
308 S.E.2d 378, 168 Ga. App. 112, 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 2697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melton-v-state-gactapp-1983.