Melton v. State

105 S.E. 247, 25 Ga. App. 755, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 192
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedNovember 9, 1920
Docket11717
StatusPublished

This text of 105 S.E. 247 (Melton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Melton v. State, 105 S.E. 247, 25 Ga. App. 755, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 192 (Ga. Ct. App. 1920).

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The conviction of the defendant did not depend entirely upon circumstantial evidence; the evidence, circumstantial and direct, amply authorized the verdict, and none of the special grounds of the motion for a new trial is meritorious.

Judgment affirmed.

Luke and Bloodworth, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
105 S.E. 247, 25 Ga. App. 755, 1920 Ga. App. LEXIS 192, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melton-v-state-gactapp-1920.