Melton v. State

620 S.W.2d 946, 273 Ark. 474, 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1387
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided September 14, 1981·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Lynn Melton, by his attorney, Thomas A. Martin, Jr., filed a motion for a rule on the clerk. The motion does not contain the necessary affidavit as required by this Court in a Per Curiam order of February 5, 1979, 265 Ark. 964 (1979).

It is the responsibility of the attorney of record to see that the record on appeal is properly maintained. See Nelson v. State, 272 Ark. 287, 613 S.W. 2d 598 (1981) and Wilson v. State, 273 Ark. 456, 620 S.W. 2d 936 (1981).

The motion will be denied without prejudice to file a second time.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Melton v. State, 620 S.W.2d 946, 273 Ark. 474, 1981 Ark. LEXIS 1387 (Ark. 1981).

620 S.W.2d 946 (Melton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neighbors v. State
800 S.W.2d 438 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1990)
McCraney v. State
772 S.W.2d 597 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1989)
Finley v. State
661 S.W.2d 358 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1983)