Melton v. State
142 So. 659, 139 So. 87, 224 Ala. 152, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 41
Opinions
The cause was submitted on the record proper. There was no bill of exceptions. The record has been carefully examined, and the judgment entry on the date of the trial, April 24; 1930, is insufficient, in that it fails to disclose the fact that the defendant and his attorney were present at the trial. For this reason the judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.
Reversed and remanded.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Melton v. State, 142 So. 659, 139 So. 87, 224 Ala. 152, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 41 (Ala. 1931).
142 So. 659 (Melton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Burns v. State
145 So. 436 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Oliver v. State
140 So. 180 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1932)