Melton v. State

142 So. 659, 139 So. 87, 224 Ala. 152, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 41
Supreme Court of Alabama·Decided December 17, 1931·No. 4 Div. 610.·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

THOMAS, J.

The cause was submitted on the record proper. There was no bill of exceptions. The record has been carefully examined, and the judgment entry on the date of the trial, April 24; 1930, is insufficient, in that it fails to disclose the fact that the defendant and his attorney were present at the trial. For this reason the judgment of the circuit court is reversed, and the cause is remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, O. J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Melton v. State, 142 So. 659, 139 So. 87, 224 Ala. 152, 1931 Ala. LEXIS 41 (Ala. 1931).

142 So. 659 (Melton v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burns v. State
145 So. 436 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1932)
Oliver v. State
140 So. 180 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1932)