Melton v. Orange County Democratic Party

Fourth Circuit

Melton v. Orange County Democratic Party

111 F. App'x 707

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 2, 2004·No. No. 04-1329·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Susan Sexton Melton appeals the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to Appellees on her claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Melton v. Orange County Democratic Party, No. CA-96-517-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 11, 2004; entered Feb. 12, 2004). We deny Melton’s motion to authorize preparation of a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Susan Sexton Melton appeals the district court’s order awarding summary judgment to Appellees on her claim under the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12101-12213 (2000). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Melton v. Orange County Democratic Party, No. CA-96-517-1 (M.D.N.C. filed Feb. 11, 2004; entered Feb. 12, 2004). We deny Melton’s motion to authorize preparation of a transcript at government expense. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Melton v. Orange County Democratic Party, 111 F. App'x 707 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

111 F. App'x 707 (Melton v. Orange County Democratic Party) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related