Melton v. Moore

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Melton v. Moore

816 So. 2d 1236, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7635, 2002 WL 1085150

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 31, 2002

DocketNo. 1D00-4305

StatusPublished

This text of 816 So. 2d 1236 (Melton v. Moore) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Melton v. Moore, 816 So. 2d 1236, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7635, 2002 WL 1085150 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The circuit court summarily denied appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus, finding that he had failed to demonstrate the exhaustion of administrative remedies. In a renewed motion joined in by appellee Florida Parole Commission, appellee Moore moves to relinquish jurisdiction to the circuit court for further consideration of the merits of the petition, stating that upon careful review of the record, it appears that appellant substantially complied with the exhaustion requirement. See Woullard v. Bishop, 734 So.2d 1151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Our review of the attachments to the petition below confirms that at least some elements of appellant’s claims were presented in the administrative grievance process. Accordingly; we elect to treat the motion to relinquish jurisdiction as a confession of error and reverse and remand for further proceedings.¹

ALLEN, C.J., MINER and WOLF, JJ„ concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The circuit court summarily denied appellant’s petition for writ of mandamus, finding that he had failed to demonstrate the exhaustion of administrative remedies. In a renewed motion joined in by appellee Florida Parole Commission, appellee Moore moves to relinquish jurisdiction to the circuit court for further consideration of the merits of the petition, stating that upon careful review of the record, it appears that appellant substantially complied with the exhaustion requirement. See Woullard v. Bishop, 734 So.2d 1151 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). Our review of the attachments to the petition below confirms that at least some elements of appellant’s claims were presented in the administrative grievance process. Accordingly; we elect to treat the motion to relinquish jurisdiction as a confession of error and reverse and remand for further proceedings.¹

ALLEN, C.J., MINER and WOLF, JJ„ concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

816 So. 2d 1236, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 7635, 2002 WL 1085150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melton-v-moore-fladistctapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack