Melton v. Lambard

51 Cal. 258
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1876·No. No. 4930·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

By the Court:

The plaintiffs claim title to an undivided interest in the Earle Mine, through a verbal sale made by Earle. A mine is real estate, and an interest therein, other than an estate at Avill, or for a term not exceeding one year, can be transferred only by operation of law or by an instrument in writing subscribed by the party disposing of the same, or by his agent thereunto authorized by Avriting. (Civil Code, Sec. 1091.)

The defendant was the owner of an undivided interest in the mining claim, and as such Avas entitled to the exclusive possession thereof, as against the plaintiffs—they not having shown any title in themselves.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Melton v. Lambard, 51 Cal. 258 (Cal. 1876).

51 Cal. 258 (Melton v. Lambard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Leishman v. Union Iron Works
83 P. 30 (California Supreme Court, 1905)
Williams v. Gibson
84 Ala. 228 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1887)
Hirbour v. Reeding
3 Mont. 15 (Montana Supreme Court, 1877)