Melton v. Albany Fertilizer Co.
This text of 38 S.E. 958 (Melton v. Albany Fertilizer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. When in the trial of a claim case the claimant admits the possession of the property by the defendant in fi. fa. at the time of the levy', he assumes the burden of showing that the title is in him and that it was not' in the defendant at any time from the date of the judgment to the date of the levy.
2. The evidence clearly showed that the title to the crops levied on was in the claimant at all times from the date of the general judgment against thé defendant to the date of the levy ; the verdict finding the property subject was therefore contrary to law, and the judge erred in ref using to grant anew trial.
3. That the defendant in fi. fa. procured a surety for the claimants on their forthcoming and claim bonds and took charge of the property was not sufficient to show that the title was not in the claimants.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
38 S.E. 958, 113 Ga. 603, 1901 Ga. LEXIS 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melton-v-albany-fertilizer-co-ga-1901.