Meloro v. Smith

216 So. 2d 37
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 3, 1968·No. No. 67-1033·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have fully considered appellant’s points on appeal and have concluded that the trial court was correct in holding that service of process was lawfully made and that the court obtained jurisdiction of the defendant. See: Lienard v. DeWitt, Fla.1963, 153 So.2d 302; L. P. Evans Motors, Inc. v. Meyer, Fla.App.1960, 119 So.2d 301.

No harmful error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Meloro v. Smith, 216 So. 2d 37 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

216 So. 2d 37 (Meloro v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lienard v. DeWitt
153 So. 2d 302 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1963)
L. P. Evans Motors, Inc. v. Meyer
119 So. 2d 301 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1960)