Meloro v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Meloro v. Smith

216 So. 2d 37

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 3, 1968

DocketNo. 67-1033

StatusPublished

This text of 216 So. 2d 37 (Meloro v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Meloro v. Smith, 216 So. 2d 37 (Fla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We have fully considered appellant’s points on appeal and have concluded that the trial court was correct in holding that service of process was lawfully made and that the court obtained jurisdiction of the defendant. See: Lienard v. DeWitt, Fla.1963, 153 So.2d 302; L. P. Evans Motors, Inc. v. Meyer, Fla.App.1960, 119 So.2d 301.

No harmful error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We have fully considered appellant’s points on appeal and have concluded that the trial court was correct in holding that service of process was lawfully made and that the court obtained jurisdiction of the defendant. See: Lienard v. DeWitt, Fla.1963, 153 So.2d 302; L. P. Evans Motors, Inc. v. Meyer, Fla.App.1960, 119 So.2d 301.

No harmful error having been made to appear, the judgment appealed is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 So. 2d 37, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/meloro-v-smith-fladistctapp-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack