Melon v. Epstein

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Melon v. Epstein

13 A.D.2d 456, 217 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12264

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 7, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 456 (Melon v. Epstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Melon v. Epstein, 13 A.D.2d 456, 217 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12264 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the proceeding to be heard on the original record. [457]*457without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points, upon condition that the petitioner serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed points on the attorney for respondents and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of petitioner’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before March 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the May 1961 Term of this court, said proceeding to be argued or submitted when reached. The stay contained in the order of Mr. Justice Spector, dated February 14, 1961, is continued pending the hearing and determination of the appeal. Concur-—Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dispense with printing granted insofar as to permit the proceeding to be heard on the original record. [457]*457without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed petitioner’s points, upon condition that the petitioner serves one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed points on the attorney for respondents and files 6 typewritten or 19 mimeographed copies of petitioner’s points, together with the original record, with this court on or before March 28, 1961, with notice of argument for the May 1961 Term of this court, said proceeding to be argued or submitted when reached. The stay contained in the order of Mr. Justice Spector, dated February 14, 1961, is continued pending the hearing and determination of the appeal. Concur-—Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, Stevens and Eager, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 456, 217 N.Y.S.2d 470, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12264, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melon-v-epstein-nyappdiv-1961.