Melo-Cordero v. Shaddai Transport LLC

Opinion

ine UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JELECTRAMICALLY □□□□□ SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Bc epermpamengey □□ we eX pars acon 47/24 | FRANCISCO MELO-CORDERO, □□ Plaintiff, ~against- 21-CV-4837 (LAK) WINDELL I. ROBINSON, et al., Defendants. ee ee ee ee ee HX

ORDER

LEWIS A. KAPLAN, District Judge. _ Jurisdiction is invoked pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332. The complaint and amended complaint fail adequately to allege the existence of subject matter jurisdiction because, perhaps among other things, it fails adequately to allege: Ml The citizenship of one or more natural persons. See, ¢e.¢., Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'n v. Edwards, 194 U.S. 377 (1904); Leveraged Leasing Administration Corp.v. PacifiCorp Capital, Inc., 87 F.3d 44 (2d Cir. 1996), O The citizenship of one or more corporations. See 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). Oo The citizenship of one or more partnerships. See Carden v. Arkoma Assocs., 494 U.S. 195 (1990). fx] The exact nature and citizenship of one or more alleged limited liability companies. See Handlesman v. Bedford Village Green Assocs. L.P., 213 F.3d 48, 52 (2d Cir. 2000). Absent the filing, on or before September 24, 2024, ofa second amended complaint, amended solely so as to allege adequately the existence of subject matter jurisdiction, this action will be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. SO ORDERED. Dated: September 10, 2024 bi Lewis A, Kaplan United States District Judge