Melnick v. Farrell
This text of 194 A.D.2d 718 (Melnick v. Farrell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DiNoto, J.), entered May 6, 1991, which granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
We agree with the Supreme Court that the plaintiffs have failed to raise any triable issues of fact as to whether the plaintiff Harriet Melnick sustained a "serious injury” within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, Licari v Elliot, 57 NY2d 230; Tipping-Cestari v Kilkenny, 174 AD2d 663). Thompson, J. P., Sullivan, Miller, Ritter and Santucci, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
194 A.D.2d 718, 601 N.Y.S.2d 804, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6462, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melnick-v-farrell-nyappdiv-1993.