Melnick v. Eagle Grocery Co.
181 A. 220, 13 N.J. Misc. 508, 1935 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 277
Opinion
In this case no specification of determination in the trial court adequately presents any legal question for reversal. Booth v. Keegan, 108 N. J. L. 538; 159 Atl. Rep. 402; Grossman v. Lincoln Trust Co., 106 N. J. L. 567; 146 Atl. Rep. 376; Abbe v. Erie Railroad Co., 97 N. J. L. 212; 116 Atl. Rep. 778.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Melnick v. Eagle Grocery Co., 181 A. 220, 13 N.J. Misc. 508, 1935 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 277 (N.J. 1935).
181 A. 220 (Melnick v. Eagle Grocery Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Booth v. Keegan
159 A. 402 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1932)
A. Fishman Hat Company v. Rosen
146 A. 376 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1929)
Abbe v. Erie Railroad
116 A. 778 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1922)