Mellon v. Prosser

494 S.E.2d 763, 347 N.C. 568, 1998 N.C. LEXIS 14
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided February 6, 1998·No. No. 361A97·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

That part of the opinion of the majority in the Court of Appeals remanding this action to the Superior Court for joinder of the sheriff’s surety as a party is reversed for the reasons set forth in the dissenting opinion of Judge Wynn. In all other respects, the opinion of the majority in the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated therein.

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mellon v. Prosser, 494 S.E.2d 763, 347 N.C. 568, 1998 N.C. LEXIS 14 (N.C. 1998).

494 S.E.2d 763 (Mellon v. Prosser) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Efird v. Riley
342 F. Supp. 2d 413 (M.D. North Carolina, 2004)
Sellers v. Rodriguez
561 S.E.2d 336 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2002)