Mellon v. McKinley

Supreme Court

Mellon v. McKinley

275 U.S. 492

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 24, 1927·No. No. 54·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The grounds which were presented in the petition for certio-rari, because of .which the writ was granted, do not prove to have a substantial basis in the record, and the certiorari heretofore granted in this case is therefore vacated upon the authority of United States v. McFarland, ante, p. 485; Southern Power Co. v. North Carolina Service Co., 263 [493] U. S. 508; Houston Oil Co. v. Goodrich, 245 U. S. 440.

Mr. Ashby M. Warren for petitioner. Mr. Thomas C.. Mapother was pn'the brief for respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The grounds which were presented in the petition for certio-rari, because of .which the writ was granted, do not prove to have a substantial basis in the record, and the certiorari heretofore granted in this case is therefore vacated upon the authority of United States v. McFarland, ante, p. 485; Southern Power Co. v. North Carolina Service Co., 263 [493] U. S. 508; Houston Oil Co. v. Goodrich, 245 U. S. 440.

Mr. Ashby M. Warren for petitioner. Mr. Thomas C.. Mapother was pn'the brief for respondent.

Mellon v. McKinley, 275 U.S. 492 (1927).

Pincite

275 U.S. 492 (Mellon v. McKinley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related