Mello v. Narco Cab Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mello v. Narco Cab Corp.

105 A.D.3d 634, 963 N.Y.S.2d 581

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 25, 2013

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 105 A.D.3d 634 (Mello v. Narco Cab Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mello v. Narco Cab Corp., 105 A.D.3d 634, 963 N.Y.S.2d 581 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered April 11, 2012, which, in this action for personal injuries allegedly sustained in a motor vehicle accident, denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability as against all defendants, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted to the extent of finding no culpable conduct by plaintiff on the issue of liability, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

Plaintiff established that, as a back-seat passenger in a taxi cab that rear-ended a second vehicle, she was free of negligence as a matter of law. Plaintiff testified that just before the ac[635]*635cident occurred, her friend, who was with her in the back seat, was in the process of instructing the driver to slow down. The driver testified he did not hear plaintiffs friend, and there is no basis for finding that plaintiff or her friend did anything to cause the accident or could have prevented it (cf. Bruni v City of New York, 2 NY3d 319, 328 [2004]). Since plaintiff was an innocent rear-seat passenger who cannot be found at fault under any version of how the accident occurred, the motion should have been granted to the extent indicated (see Garcia v Tri-County Ambulette Serv., 282 AD2d 206 [1st Dept 2001]; see also Medina v Rodriguez, 92 AD3d 850 [2d Dept 2012]).

Concur— Tom, J.E, Acosta, Saxe, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (George J. Silver, J.), entered April 11, 2012, which, in this action for personal injuries allegedly sustained in a motor vehicle accident, denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability as against all defendants, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion granted to the extent of finding no culpable conduct by plaintiff on the issue of liability, and the matter remanded for further proceedings.

Plaintiff established that, as a back-seat passenger in a taxi cab that rear-ended a second vehicle, she was free of negligence as a matter of law. Plaintiff testified that just before the ac[635]*635cident occurred, her friend, who was with her in the back seat, was in the process of instructing the driver to slow down. The driver testified he did not hear plaintiffs friend, and there is no basis for finding that plaintiff or her friend did anything to cause the accident or could have prevented it (cf. Bruni v City of New York, 2 NY3d 319, 328 [2004]). Since plaintiff was an innocent rear-seat passenger who cannot be found at fault under any version of how the accident occurred, the motion should have been granted to the extent indicated (see Garcia v Tri-County Ambulette Serv., 282 AD2d 206 [1st Dept 2001]; see also Medina v Rodriguez, 92 AD3d 850 [2d Dept 2012]).

Concur— Tom, J.E, Acosta, Saxe, Freedman and Feinman, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 A.D.3d 634, 963 N.Y.S.2d 581, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mello-v-narco-cab-corp-nyappdiv-2013.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack