Mello v. Board of Parole
282 A.D. 940, 126 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5512
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 24, 1953·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order unanimously affirmed upon the ground that the motion was premature. We, therefore, do not consider at this time whether the statement made in the memorandum decision on the prior appeal (People ex reí. Mello v. McDonnell, 281 App. Div. 970) relating to the sentences running concurrently is applicable to a case like the present one where the convictions and sentences occurred at widely separated times. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Cohn, Callahan and Botein, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Mello v. Board of Parole, 282 A.D. 940, 126 N.Y.S.2d 192, 1953 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5512 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1953).
282 A.D. 940 (Mello v. Board of Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Armone v. McHugh
9 Misc. 2d 258 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)