Mellet v. Reading Transit Co.
This text of 55 Pa. Super. 465 (Mellet v. Reading Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We are all of opinion that there was but slight evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant, and that even if it be conceded that there was sufficient to carry the question to the jury, the plaintiff was barred of recovery by the contributory negligence of his chauffeur who was operating his automobile. This has been so clearly and conclusively shown by the learned trial judge upon a full and accurate review of the evidence and of the law applicable thereto as to render further discussion unnecessary.
The judgment is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
55 Pa. Super. 465, 1913 Pa. Super. LEXIS 396, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mellet-v-reading-transit-co-pasuperct-1913.