Mellen v. Reilly

916 N.E.2d 758, 455 Mass. 1007, 2009 Mass. LEXIS 724
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedNovember 12, 2009
StatusPublished

This text of 916 N.E.2d 758 (Mellen v. Reilly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mellen v. Reilly, 916 N.E.2d 758, 455 Mass. 1007, 2009 Mass. LEXIS 724 (Mass. 2009).

Opinion

The plaintiff’s submissions, both in the county court and in this court, fail to establish any basis for relief. He does not provide any evidence to support his assertions or to demonstrate that he is entitled to the relief that he seeks. [1008]*1008Furthermore, his arguments do not rise to the level of adequate appellate argument, and we thus need not address them. See Mass. R. A. P. 16 (a) (4), as amended, 367 Mass. 921 (1975). The single justice did not err in denying the relief sought.

Douglas S. Martland, Assistant Attorney General, for the defendant. Jay Patrick Mellen, pro se, submitted a brief.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
916 N.E.2d 758, 455 Mass. 1007, 2009 Mass. LEXIS 724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mellen-v-reilly-mass-2009.