Mellen v. Mellen

19 N.Y.S. 1001, 47 N.Y. St. Rep. 930
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Mellen v. Mellen. Read the opinion of the Court — 16 N.Y.S. 191
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 7, 1892·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The respondents demurred to the complaint on the ground that it did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The demurrer was overruled at special term, and, from the order and interlocutory judgment entered overruling it,, the present respondents appealed to the general term of this court. There the demurrer was sustained, and the order and interlocutory judgment overruling the demurrer were reversed, and final judgment directed to be entered dismissing the complaint, with costs. The opinion of the general term sustaining the demurrer, which is to be found in the case, (14 N. Y. Supp. 665.) is controlling,- and, as the questions now presented were therein fully discussed and passed upon, nothing remains but to affirm the judgment, with costs and disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Mellen v. Mellen, 19 N.Y.S. 1001, 47 N.Y. St. Rep. 930 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1892).

19 N.Y.S. 1001 (Mellen v. Mellen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mellen v. Banning
14 N.Y.S. 665 (New York Supreme Court, 1891)