Mell v. Norton

Supreme Court of Georgia

Mell v. Norton

177 S.E. 557, 179 Ga. 871, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 429

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedDecember 12, 1934

DocketNo. 10315

StatusPublished

This text of 177 S.E. 557 (Mell v. Norton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mell v. Norton, 177 S.E. 557, 179 Ga. 871, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 429 (Ga. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Beck, P. J.

This was an equitable petition, which stated a cause of action good as against a general demurrer. The remedy at law was not as adequate as the equitable remedy sought; and the court erred in sustaining the general demurrer.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, O. J., who dissents. Brennan & Giles, for plaintiff. Louis U. Foster and Smith, Smith & Bloodworth, for defendants.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Beck, P. J.

This was an equitable petition, which stated a cause of action good as against a general demurrer. The remedy at law was not as adequate as the equitable remedy sought; and the court erred in sustaining the general demurrer.

Judgment reversed.

All the Justices concur, except Russell, O. J., who dissents. Brennan & Giles, for plaintiff. Louis U. Foster and Smith, Smith & Bloodworth, for defendants.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

177 S.E. 557, 179 Ga. 871, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mell-v-norton-ga-1934.