Melker v. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance

46 P.2d 1059, 182 Wash. 267, 1935 Wash. LEXIS 643
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedJune 24, 1935
DocketNo. 25673. Department Two.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 46 P.2d 1059 (Melker v. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Melker v. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance, 46 P.2d 1059, 182 Wash. 267, 1935 Wash. LEXIS 643 (Wash. 1935).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This appeal is here on an order sustaining a demurrer to the affirmative defense and cross-complaint of appellant John Manos.

It is stated in the brief of appellant that he elected to stand on the allegation of the affirmative answer and cross-complaint. He did not ask leave to plead further, and there is no judgment in the record dismissing his affirmative answer and cross-complaint.

Although respondent has made no motion to dismiss the appeal, either in the briefs or otherwise, it *268 is well settled by our decisions that no appealable judgment was entered, and the appeal must be dismissed upon our own motion.

The appeal is therefore dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Melker v. Detroit Fire & Marine Insurance
59 P.2d 363 (Washington Supreme Court, 1936)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 P.2d 1059, 182 Wash. 267, 1935 Wash. LEXIS 643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melker-v-detroit-fire-marine-insurance-wash-1935.