MELISSA TRIPODI v. ADAM MAC NACER

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 19, 2022
Docket21-2234
StatusPublished

This text of MELISSA TRIPODI v. ADAM MAC NACER (MELISSA TRIPODI v. ADAM MAC NACER) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
MELISSA TRIPODI v. ADAM MAC NACER, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

Opinion

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida

Opinion filed October 19, 2022. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.

________________

No. 3D21-2234 Lower Tribunal No. 19-0803 ________________

Melissa Tripodi, Appellant,

vs.

Adam Mac Nacer, et al., Appellees.

An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Miami-Dade County, Christina Marie DiRaimondo, Judge.

Melissa Tripodi, in proper person.

Dr. Malissa Tigges, Guardian ad Litem, in proper person.

Before LOGUE, LINDSEY, and BOKOR, JJ.

PER CURIAM. Appellant Melissa Tripodi appeals an order of the circuit court granting

Dr. Malissa Tigges’s Motion for Guardian ad Litem Attorney’s Fees and

Costs. Tripodi has failed to provide a transcript of the circuit court’s hearing

on this Motion but contends that the circuit court’s order was erroneous on

its face and can be reversed even in the absence of a transcript. We

agree. This Court has held that “[a]n award of attorney’s fees without making

adequate findings justifying the amount of the award is reversible error. . . .

This is true even in the instance where a party does not provide an appellate

court with an adequate record or a transcript of proceedings.” Babun v. Stok

Kon + Braverman, 335 So. 3d 1236, 1240 (Fla. 3d DCA 2021) (citations

omitted). Accordingly, “[w]e remand with directions that the trial court

consider the evidence supporting the GAL’s request for fees and include in

any order those findings necessary to justify the grant of reasonable fees for

specific and documented services rendered, and from whom those fees are

due.” Adkins v. Sotolongo, 197 So. 3d 1233, 1235 (Fla. 3d DCA 2016).

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Adkins v. Sotolongo
197 So. 3d 1233 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
MELISSA TRIPODI v. ADAM MAC NACER, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/melissa-tripodi-v-adam-mac-nacer-fladistctapp-2022.